Performance Evaluation of the Optimized Design Ratio Between the Diameters of the Basin and Curved Blade in the Gravitational Water Vortex Turbine
Authors
-
Christie Claire D. BOISER
Ateneo De Davao University,
Philippines
0009-0000-4836-2199
-
Lance Arthur Lim CARPIO
Ateneo De Davao University,
Philippines
0009-0008-5808-0994
-
Philip Jun S. CELERINOS
Ateneo De Davao University,
Philippines
0009-0009-3919-2357
-
Joven Dy S. LEE
Ateneo De Davao University,
Philippines
0009-0006-0716-8748
-
Gary G. PINILI
Ateneo De Davao University,
Philippines
0009-0003-9178-265X
Abstract
The key role of the gravitational water vortex turbine (GWVT) is to generate electricity to support modern civilization in their essential daily needs by harnessing kinetic energy from flowing water. With this, the lack of access to electricity can be addressed by utilizing the potential of the Philippines’ abundant bodies of water. This study evaluates the impact of low-density turbine blades on the GWVT with reference to the selected parameters: rotational speed and mechanical efficiency. The ANSYS simulation and laboratory test both found that the 0.55 ratio between the diameters of the nylon rod blade and the optimized basin with guide vanes achieved the highest rotational speed of 205.95 RPM and 120.1 RPM, respectively. Conversely, the design with a 0.60 ratio between the diameters of the steel blade and the normal basin provided optimum performance, achieving an average of 98.2 RPM and the highest mechanical efficiency of 43.75%, thereby preventing energy loss and maximizing output performance. Results also indicated a significant difference in the performance of the GWVT using the normal basin compared to the optimized basin with guide vanes. Lastly, there was a considerable difference in the performance of the GWVT for the design ratios of 0.55, 0.60, and 0.65 for the runner blade and basin, and further analysis showed that torque and rotational speed have a linear relationship. Thus, this study could serve as a benchmark for identifying alternative materials and optimizing the design of GWVT to help improve power generation using hydropower as a source of electricity.
Keywords:
gravitational water vortex turbine, optimized basin, normal basin, steel turbine blade, nylon rod turbine bladeReferences
1. Lozano L., Taboada E., The power of electricity: How effective is it in promoting sustainable development in rural off-grid islands in the Philippines, Energies, 14(9), 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092705.
2. Bostwick S., Improving electricity in the Philippines, 2020, https://borgenproject.org/electricity-in-the-philippines/. (accessed on 2024.01.20).
3. Balita C., Energy sector in the Philippines, Statista, 2024, https://www.statista.com/topics/8548/energy-sector-in-the-philippines/topicOverview. (accessed on 2024.01.20).
4. Dickert C., What Electricity Sources Power the World?, 2023, https://elements.visualcapitalist.com/what-electricity-sources-power-the-world/. (accessed on 2024.01.20).
5. Maika N., Lin W., Khatamifar M., A review of gravitational water vortex hydro turbine systems for hydropower generation, Energies, 16(14): 5394, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/en16145394.
6. SEPO, State of Water at a Glance, 2023, https://legacy.senate.gov.ph/publications/SEPO/State%20of%20Water%20AAGAugust%202023.pdf. (accessed on 2024.01.21).
7. Jiang Y., Raji A., Raja V., Wang F., AL-bonsrulah H., Murugesan R., Ranganatha S., Multi-disciplinary optimizations of small-scale gravitational vortex hydropower (SGVHP) system through computational hydrodynamic and hydro-structural analyses, Sustainability, 14(2): 727, 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020727.
8. Bajracharya T., Rasaily B., Timilsina A., Niraula R., Effect of stay vanes in gravitational water vortex power plant with spiral basin, 21st International Seminar on Hydropower Plants-Hydropower for Future Generations, 2022, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370301646.
9. Mitra R., Patel A., Kumar U., Optimization of machining processes of guide vanes for reaction turbine, International Journal for Technological Research in Engineering, 9(6): 54–58, 2022, https://ijtre.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/2022090603.pdf. (accessed on 2024.02.17).
10. Joy J., Raisee M., Cervantes M., Study of flow characteristics inside Francis turbine draft tube with adjustable guide vanes, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 774(1): 012018, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/774/1/012018.
11. Abu-Thuraia H., CFD Analysis of the Influence of Guide Vanes, 2018, https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/984640/. (accessed on 2024.02.17).
12. Tran B., Kim B., Kim J., The effect of the guide vane number and inclined angle on the performance improvement of a low head propeller turbine, Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology, 45(4): 205–212, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5916/jamet.2021.45.4.205.
13. Sritram P., Treedet W., Suntiravakorn R., Effect of turbine materials on power generation efficiency from free water vortex hydro power plant, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 103(1): 20185, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/103/1/012018.
14. Technologies, Polypropylene vs. Nylon (Polyamide): Benefits and Drawbacks for Various Applications, SyBridge Technologie, 2024, https://sybridge.com/polypropylene-vs-nylonpolyamide/. (accessed on 2024.02.13).
15. Ullah R., Cheema T., Experimental investigation of runner design parameters on the performance of vortex turbine, Engineering Proceedings, 23(1): 14, 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2022023014.
16. Khan N., Blade optimization of gravitational water vortex turbine, Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, 2016, https://www.academia.edu/34334744/Blade_Optimization_of_Gravitational_Water_Vortex_Turbine. (accessed on 2024.02.18).
17. Obozov A., Akparaliev R., Mederov T., Ashimbekova B., Tolomushev A., Orazbaev K., Research and development of a gravitational water vortex micro-HPP in the conditions of Kyrgyzstan, Energy Reports, 10: 544–557, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.06.041.
18. ANSYS Fluent 2024 R1, Student Version 24.1, ANSYS, Inc.
19. Li N., Comparison between three different CFD software and numerical simulation, 2015, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:792705/FULLTEXT01.pdf. (accessed on 2024.02.17).
20. Betancour J., Romero-Menco F., Velasquez L., Rubio-Clemente A., Chica E., Design and optimization of a runner for a gravitational vortex turbine using the response surface methodology and experimental tests, Renewable Energy, 210: 306–320, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.045.
21. Saleem A., Cheema T., Ullah R., Ahmad S., Chattha J., Akbar B., Park C., Parametric study of single-stage gravitational water vortex turbine with cylindrical basin, Energy, 200: 117464, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117464.
22. Kittil¨a A., Z¨urich E., Institute of Geophysics, Geothermische Energie u. Geofluide, Bucket method, https://mineclosure.gtk.fi/bucket-method/. (accessed on 2024.02.19).
23. Dhakal S., Timilsina A.B., Dhakal R., Fuyal D., Bajracharya T.R., Pandit H.P., Amatya N., Nakarmi A.M., Comparison of cylindrical and conical basins with optimum position of runner: Gravitational water vortex power plant, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 48: 662–669, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.030.
24. Khan N.H., Cheema T.A., Chattha J.A., Park C.W., Effective basin-blade configurations of a gravitational water vortex turbine for microhydropower generation, Journal of Energy Engineering, 144(4): 558, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000558.
25. Kim M., Edirishinghe D., Yang H., Gunawardane S., Lee Y., Effects of blade number and draft tube in gravitational water vortex power plant determined using computational fluid dynamics simulations, Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology,
45(5): 252–262, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5916/jamet.2021.45.5.252.
26. IBM, SPSS statistics for Windows. Version 22.0, Armonk, NY: IBM, 2013.
27. Doan M.N., Kai Y., Obi S., Twin marine hydrokinetic cross-flow turbines in counter rotating configurations: A laboratory-scaled apparatus for power measurement, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(11): 918, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8110918.
28. Li H., Zhou D., Martinez J.J., Deng Z.D., Johnson K.I., Westman M.P., Design and performance of composite runner blades for ultra-low head turbines, Renewable Energy, 132: 1280–1289, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.110.
29. Bajracharya T.R., Shakya S.R., Timilsina A.B., Dhakal J., Neupane S., Gautam A., Sapkota A., Effects of geometrical parameters in gravitational water vortex turbines with conical basin, Renewable Energy, 2020: 5373784, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5373784.
